NEW CHANGES TO RHPA TO AFFECT ONTARIO’S PHYSICIANS
By Lonny J. Rosen, LL.B., C.S. and Elyse Sunshine, B.A., LL.B.*
Significant changes to the Regulated Health Professions Act, 1991 (RHPA) and its procedural
code have recently come into effect. These will dramatically affect the information about all
regulated health professionals, including physicians, that is available to the public, and will
provide health Colleges with sweeping new powers and access to more personal information
about and from their members than ever before. Some of these changes were enacted with the
passage of Bill 171 in 2007, but were not implemented until this month. Other changes were
introduced and enacted this year to enhance Colleges’ powers of investigation. This article will
summarize some of the more significant changes to the RHPA’s Procedural Code.
Enhanced Mandatory Reporting
The RHPA and its procedural code previously imposed very limited reporting obligations. These
arose only when a doctor learned in the course of his or her practice, that a patient had been
sexually abused by a health professional or when a health professional’s employment had been
terminated or suspended because of misconduct, incompetence or incapacity.
These reporting obligations remain. Now, however, operators of a facility where one or more
members practice will now be required to report to the Registrar if they believe that a member
practicing at the facility is incompetent or incapacitated - regardless of whether the operator
terminates the member’s employment or association. As “facility” is not defined in the
legislation, Colleges are likely to interpret the word broadly.
These obligations may therefore apply to any person who operates any type of practice,
including a family practice or health team. If an individual fails to report in these circumstances,
he or she faces a fine of up to $25,000.00 for a first offence and could be subjected to
professional misconduct charges (if he or she is a professional). As operators of a facility may
have difficulty determining whether a member practicing at the facility is incapacitated or
incompetent, it is important for all professionals and “facility operators” to understand the legal
meaning of “incompetence” and “incapacity” and to avail themselves of legal advice before
taking any steps in this regard.
Additionally as of June 4, 2009, all health professionals are required to file a report with their
College if they have been found guilty of any offence. This obligation will enable Colleges to
investigate members’ conduct, and to determine whether the finding raises concerns relevant to
their suitability to practice. Offences reported to Colleges should not appear on the public
register unless there is a related finding of professional misconduct.
What Was Private is now Public
While the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) has made much of the public
register available on its website for some time, it must now include more information than ever
before. The result of every disciplinary and incapacity hearing, a synopsis of those decisions, all
cases which have been referred to the Discipline Committee for a hearing, notations of every
suspension or revocation that has been issued to a doctor and, for the first time, any finding of
professional negligence or malpractice made against them by a court must now be included on
the website. Doctors will now have to self-report any such findings to the CPSO.
Introducing the ‘Inquiries, Complaints and Reports’ Committee
Each College will see its Complaints Committee replaced by the Inquiries, Complaints and
Reports Committee (ICRC), which will receive all complaints, inquiries and reports about a
member. Previously, if a complaint dealt with issues of standards of practice, the Complaints
Committee could refer the matter to the Quality Assurance Committee for some form of
assessment and/or mediation. This referral power has been eliminated but the ICRC could
require a member to complete continuing education or remediation.
Enhanced Emergency Powers
What is potentially most distressing for doctors is that the CPSO’s ICRC now has the power to
make an interim order suspending their licence, without notice, if there are grounds to believe
that the doctor’s conduct exposes, or is likely to expose, his or her patients to harm or injury and
urgent intervention is needed. Previously, the CPSO Executive Committee had this authority,
but could not exercise its “emergency powers” without giving the member an opportunity to
comment.
The Past May Haunt You
Among other concerning changes to the RHPA is a requirement that the ICRC, when considering
a complaint or report about a member, consider all prior decisions about the member, including
decisions in which no misconduct was found and no action was taken (except for decisions
regarding a complaint that was found to be frivolous, or made in bad faith). These amendments
will be troubling for all doctors who have previously been the subject of a complaint - even
where no action was taken by the Complaints Committee - due to a concern that the ICRC may
be reluctant to dismiss a complaint simply because a doctor has been the subject of numerous or
similar allegations in the past. Further, while information about past decisions will not
necessarily be disclosed to a complainant, such information may still become available in a
review, appeal or subsequent proceeding.
Alternative Dispute Resolution
Another change to the regulatory regime is that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is now
formally available for the resolution of a complaint matter. A complaint matter may only be
referred to ADR with the consent of both the complainant and the physician, as long as it does
not involve an allegation of sexual abuse. If an ADR process results in resolution, the panel has
discretion to accept the proposed resolution, but may reject the settlement and still continue with
its investigation of the complaint! If no resolution is reached, however, then all communications
between the health professional, the complainant and any facilitator in connection with the ADR
process shall remain confidential and cannot be part used in any subsequent proceeding.
Penalties Effective Immediately
Presently, most Discipline Committee orders which suspend or revoke a doctor’s license or
impose terms, conditions or limitations on the license, will not take effect until he or she has had
the opportunity to appeal and the appeal has been decided. Colleges will now be permitted to
apply to the Court to have the decision of the Discipline Committee take effect immediately,
notwithstanding the commencement of an appeal. Additionally, if a doctor is found guilty of
certain types of sexual abuse or has his or her licence suspended or revoked on the grounds of
incapacity or incompetence, the suspension or revocation takes effect immediately, despite any
appeal.
Enhanced Powers of College Investigators
CPSO Investigations have typically involved chart reviews and witness interviews, but rarely
have investigators sought to compel the physicians under investigation to answer questions or to
carry out procedures while under investigation. When the CPSO attempted to employ these
investigative techniques in the course of recent investigations, some of the physicians being
investigated challenged the scope of the CPSO’s investigative powers. The Divisional Court
accepted the CPSO’s expansive interpretation of its investigative powers, but the Ontario Court
of Appeal agreed to hear the physicians’ appeal and did so (the decision is under reserve). In the
interim, however, rather than awaiting the Court of Appeal’s ruling, the Government of Ontario
has enacted Bill 141, further amending the Code to authorize investigators to “make reasonable
inquiries of the member who is the subject of the investigation” and to compel the member to
cooperate fully with an investigator. The Code now provides for direct observation of a member
in his or her practice, including the direct observation by inspectors of procedures (i.e. surgery).
It appears that regardless of the Court of Appeal’s determination, CPSO investigators and
inspectors will have significantly greater and more intrusive powers at their disposal.
Conclusion
While these amendments will no doubt allow for the CPSO, patients and members of the public
to learn more about Ontario’s doctors, there is no corresponding enhancement of doctors’ rights
or procedural protections. Such protections will still be available in connection with many
proceedings, but the concern remains that doctors will find themselves embroiled in more
conflicts and other proceedings as a result of the College’s enhanced investigative powers and
the increased information disclosure required by the new amendments. For these reasons, access
to advice from lawyers who specialize in representing health professionals in regulatory
proceedings will be more important than ever before.
This column is intended to convey brief, timely, but only general information and does not constitute legal
advice. Readers are encouraged to speak with legal counsel to understand how the general issues noted
above apply to their particular circumstances.
*Lonny J. Rosen (a Certified Specialist in Health Law) and Elyse Sunshine are partners in the Health
Law Group at Gardiner Roberts LLP. Please talk to Elyse or Lonny about how the changes discussed
in this article will impact your practice. Elyse can be reached at: 416.369.4343 or by e-mail
esunshine@gardiner-roberts.com. Lonny can be reached at:
416-369-4345 or by e-mail:
lrosen@gardiner-roberts.com
A FORUM on ONTARIO MEDICINE: business and professional Information from various contributors edited by Dr.Alex Franklin MBBS(Lond.)Dip.Phys.Med(UK) DPH & DIH(Tor.)LMC(C)FLex(USA).Fellow Med.Soc.London, Liveryman of London Society of Apothecaries. Freeman of City of London. Member Toronto Faculty club & Toronto Medico-Legal society.
9 Nov 2011
5 Nov 2011
Ontario College Physicians & Surgeons uses Private investigators with secret cameras.
In three published discipline cases`the CPSO used secret cameras and private investigators.
SPYTECH has`details of hidden cameras.
http://www.spytech.com/
In USA some doctors are recording all patient contacts.
CAMERA DETECTOR $1000
SPYTECH has`details of hidden cameras.
http://www.spytech.com/
In USA some doctors are recording all patient contacts.
CAMERA DETECTOR $1000
| Mini Gadgets CD-PRO Pro Camera Detector |
4 Nov 2011
ONTARIO: GP with FOCUSED PRACTICE a copy of UK GPwSI (GP with Special Interest)
Ontario College Phys & Surgeons (CPSO) has copied UK NHS status of "GPwSI"; above basic GP but below a Specialist. GPwSIs often work as hospital clinic assistants to UK Consultants.
CPSO changed the phrase of "Practice Limited to...."
Now "GP with Focused Practice in..."
The "GP" must be included to le4t the public know that the doctor is NOT a Specialist. (The result of the YAZDANFAR case when a GP who did liposuction killed a patient.)
The new`law will help Specialists who trained abroad but can not or will not take the Canadian specialty exams.
It will also help GPs who want to rise above the herd by taking extra courses. It will also help provide a degree of specialised services in parts of Ontario where Specialists do not want to live.
CPSO changed the phrase of "Practice Limited to...."
Now "GP with Focused Practice in..."
The "GP" must be included to le4t the public know that the doctor is NOT a Specialist. (The result of the YAZDANFAR case when a GP who did liposuction killed a patient.)
The new`law will help Specialists who trained abroad but can not or will not take the Canadian specialty exams.
It will also help GPs who want to rise above the herd by taking extra courses. It will also help provide a degree of specialised services in parts of Ontario where Specialists do not want to live.
| GP Focused Practice Designation: Policy and Program Overview September 2011 Page 34 of 39 Appendix B: Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada List of Specialties and Subspecialties Adolescent Medicine |
| Anatomical Pathology |
| Anaesthesiology |
| Cardiac Surgery |
| Cardiology |
| Clinical Immunology and Allergy |
| Clinical Pharmacology |
| Clinician Investigator Program |
| Colorectal Surgery |
| Community Medicine |
| Critical Care Medicine |
| Dermatology |
| Developmental Paediatrics |
| Diagnostic Radiology |
| Emergency Medicine |
| Endocrinology and Metabolism |
| Forensic Pathology |
| Gastroenterology |
| General Pathology |
| General Surgery |
| General Surgical Oncology |
| Geriatric Medicine |
| Gynecologic Oncology |
| Gynecologic Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility |
| Hematological Pathology |
| Hematology |
| Infectious Diseases |
| Internal Medicine |
| Maternal-Fetal Medicine |
| Medical Biochemistry |
| Medical genetics |
| Medical Microbiology |
| Medical Oncology |
| Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine |
| Nephrology |
| Neurology |
| Neuropathology |
| Neuroradiology |
| Neurosurgery |
| Nuclear Medicine |
| Obstetrics and Gynecology |
| Occupational medicine |
| Ophthalmology |
| Orthopedic Surgery |
| Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery |
| Palliative Medicine |
| Pediatric Emergency Medicine |
| Pediatric General Surgery |
2 Nov 2011
INTERNATIONAL HUMANIST: OBIT.Dr.Robert A.Amiel BUCKMAN
IHEU Eulogy for Rob Buckman
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 03:25 PM PDT
When Rob Buckman – Humanist, oncologist, and TV personality – realized he was dying from an autoimmune disease, he thought it would be useful to make a film to help others learn from his death. He was right about the value of the film: Your Own Worst Enemy was a great critical success and helped countless people address a topic that is taboo and yet unavoidable. But Rob was wrong about the subject of the film: thanks to a new treatment he survived another three decades after the 1981 movie. And those three decades were filled with the love, learning and laughter that made him a hugely popular figure on both sides of the Atlantic.It was somewhere over the Atlantic that death finally caught up with Rob Buckman on October 9, 2011. He died in his sleep while flying back to Toronto after filming some health shows in London. He was 63. He is survived by his first wife, Joan van den Ende, and their two daughters, Joanna and Susie, and by his second wife, Pat Shaw, and their two sons, James and Matthew.
The attitude that led Rob to make Your Own Worst Enemy was typical of his life. He used his remarkable communication skills to share his medical expertise with the widest possible audience. But he was so much more than just an expert communicator: he laid bare his essential humanity, right down to the details of his own mortality, in order to help others find understanding and comfort. And these rare talents can be found throughout his life, intertwined in his vocations as physician, communicator and Humanist.
The 1994 Canadian Humanist of the Year, Rob was always eager to help the Humanist movement. For more than a decade, starting in 1999, he was a hands-on president of the Humanist Association of Canada. He also worked with the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU) serving as Chairman of the Advisory Board for IHEU’s bio-ethics center at the United Nations. He made frequent trips from Toronto to New York City to help the bio-ethics center, speaking at the center's conferences and contributing to UN briefings.
Rob grew up in London, and then went to St John's College, Cambridge, where he graduated in medicine in 1972. At Cambridge he was a star in the famous Footlights troupe, which has featured so many of Britain's leading comedians.As a junior doctor at University College Hospital, London, he met Chris Beetles, and they teamed up as "Beetles and Buckman" Buckman" to perform live comedy and revue. Rob wrote for the long-running satirical BBC Radio 4 show Week Ending, and for a TV sitcom, Doctor On the Go, based on Richard Gordon's Doctor in the House books. In the 1980s, Rob went on to front a long-running TV medical series with Miriam Stoppard, Where There's Life.
In 1985 Rob emigrated to Canada, working as an oncologist at Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto, before moving to Toronto’s Princess Margaret Hospital. He also became a full professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto and adjunct professor at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. He specialized in breast cancer and also in teaching communication skills in oncology to physicians and nurses.In Canada, Rob continue his career presenting television science-and-medicine programmes Magic or Medicine? his series on ‘alternative medicine’, won him a Gemini award (the Canadian TV Industry equivalent of an Emmy).
As well as writing a weekly column for the Toronto Globe and Mail, Rob wrote 15 books. Many of these aimed to help people deal with death and dying, including: How To Break Bad News: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals; What You Really Need To Know About Cancer: A Comprehensive Guide for Patients and their Families; Cancer is a Word, Not a Sentence: A Practical Guide to Help You Through the First Few Weeks; and I Don't Know What To Say - How To Help And Support Someone Who Is Dying. His autobiography was titled Not Dead Yet. He also wrote a national best-seller exploring his Humanist philosophy: Can We Be Good Without God? Biology, Behavior and the Need to Believe.
In Twice Around the World and Still Stupid, Rob Buckman wrote, "To me, Humanism is what you are left with if you strip away what doesn’t make sense. I was always attracted by science, and the more I learned, the more I found that many established world-philosophies (particularly among some of the organized religions) didn’t make any form of intuitive sense. Undoubtedly they bring great comfort to their believers, but I found that I was unable to sincerely believe in any divine architecture to the cosmos, or in any predetermined destiny for any race or creed or even for any individual. From my teenage years onwards, I basically came to think that we humans are a most peculiar species huddled together in a rather uneven and random way on a rather pleasant planet, and it’s up to us to do our best. I have never felt that we can look for assistance elsewhere. What we see around us is what we’ve got.
Now that might sound as if I am some sort of unemotional reductionist - a B. F. Skinner playing the role of doctor – but I know that I am not. Accepting a Humanist view of our world does not mean that you don’t feel love, anger, fright, tenderness – or even humour. A Humanist basis simply allows you to spend less of your time twisting what you see and contorting it to fit somebody else’s idea of what ought to be. Of course I could be wrong: but if I am I don’t think I shall have done all that much damage on the way – on average, Humanists don’t."--Matt Cherry, IHEU
Posted: 01 Nov 2011 03:25 PM PDT
When Rob Buckman – Humanist, oncologist, and TV personality – realized he was dying from an autoimmune disease, he thought it would be useful to make a film to help others learn from his death. He was right about the value of the film: Your Own Worst Enemy was a great critical success and helped countless people address a topic that is taboo and yet unavoidable. But Rob was wrong about the subject of the film: thanks to a new treatment he survived another three decades after the 1981 movie. And those three decades were filled with the love, learning and laughter that made him a hugely popular figure on both sides of the Atlantic.It was somewhere over the Atlantic that death finally caught up with Rob Buckman on October 9, 2011. He died in his sleep while flying back to Toronto after filming some health shows in London. He was 63. He is survived by his first wife, Joan van den Ende, and their two daughters, Joanna and Susie, and by his second wife, Pat Shaw, and their two sons, James and Matthew.
The attitude that led Rob to make Your Own Worst Enemy was typical of his life. He used his remarkable communication skills to share his medical expertise with the widest possible audience. But he was so much more than just an expert communicator: he laid bare his essential humanity, right down to the details of his own mortality, in order to help others find understanding and comfort. And these rare talents can be found throughout his life, intertwined in his vocations as physician, communicator and Humanist.
The 1994 Canadian Humanist of the Year, Rob was always eager to help the Humanist movement. For more than a decade, starting in 1999, he was a hands-on president of the Humanist Association of Canada. He also worked with the International Humanist and Ethical Union (IHEU) serving as Chairman of the Advisory Board for IHEU’s bio-ethics center at the United Nations. He made frequent trips from Toronto to New York City to help the bio-ethics center, speaking at the center's conferences and contributing to UN briefings.
Rob grew up in London, and then went to St John's College, Cambridge, where he graduated in medicine in 1972. At Cambridge he was a star in the famous Footlights troupe, which has featured so many of Britain's leading comedians.As a junior doctor at University College Hospital, London, he met Chris Beetles, and they teamed up as "Beetles and Buckman" Buckman" to perform live comedy and revue. Rob wrote for the long-running satirical BBC Radio 4 show Week Ending, and for a TV sitcom, Doctor On the Go, based on Richard Gordon's Doctor in the House books. In the 1980s, Rob went on to front a long-running TV medical series with Miriam Stoppard, Where There's Life.
In 1985 Rob emigrated to Canada, working as an oncologist at Sunnybrook Hospital in Toronto, before moving to Toronto’s Princess Margaret Hospital. He also became a full professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto and adjunct professor at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas. He specialized in breast cancer and also in teaching communication skills in oncology to physicians and nurses.In Canada, Rob continue his career presenting television science-and-medicine programmes Magic or Medicine? his series on ‘alternative medicine’, won him a Gemini award (the Canadian TV Industry equivalent of an Emmy).
As well as writing a weekly column for the Toronto Globe and Mail, Rob wrote 15 books. Many of these aimed to help people deal with death and dying, including: How To Break Bad News: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals; What You Really Need To Know About Cancer: A Comprehensive Guide for Patients and their Families; Cancer is a Word, Not a Sentence: A Practical Guide to Help You Through the First Few Weeks; and I Don't Know What To Say - How To Help And Support Someone Who Is Dying. His autobiography was titled Not Dead Yet. He also wrote a national best-seller exploring his Humanist philosophy: Can We Be Good Without God? Biology, Behavior and the Need to Believe.
In Twice Around the World and Still Stupid, Rob Buckman wrote, "To me, Humanism is what you are left with if you strip away what doesn’t make sense. I was always attracted by science, and the more I learned, the more I found that many established world-philosophies (particularly among some of the organized religions) didn’t make any form of intuitive sense. Undoubtedly they bring great comfort to their believers, but I found that I was unable to sincerely believe in any divine architecture to the cosmos, or in any predetermined destiny for any race or creed or even for any individual. From my teenage years onwards, I basically came to think that we humans are a most peculiar species huddled together in a rather uneven and random way on a rather pleasant planet, and it’s up to us to do our best. I have never felt that we can look for assistance elsewhere. What we see around us is what we’ve got.
Now that might sound as if I am some sort of unemotional reductionist - a B. F. Skinner playing the role of doctor – but I know that I am not. Accepting a Humanist view of our world does not mean that you don’t feel love, anger, fright, tenderness – or even humour. A Humanist basis simply allows you to spend less of your time twisting what you see and contorting it to fit somebody else’s idea of what ought to be. Of course I could be wrong: but if I am I don’t think I shall have done all that much damage on the way – on average, Humanists don’t."--Matt Cherry, IHEU
30 Oct 2011
LYTINSKI-CONN SYNDROME (Primary Aldosteronism)
At a Toronto International Endocine conference,Melbourne (Clayton) Prince Henry's Institute, Senior Fellow Prof. John FUNDER AO, MD,PhD, FRCP,FRACP pointed out that Dr. Michal LYTINSKI published in Polish before Dr.Jerome CONN.
Primary Aldosteronism is missed in most hypertensives.. 20% of the Canadian population are hypertensive( 6,800,000) 10% of hypertensives have Primary Aldosteronism (680,000). Mainly undiagnosed at present through "cost, ignorance & indifference". Less than 1% of those with Primary Aldosteronism are screened; especially indicated in Atrial fibrillation.
"Guidelines for Primary Hypertension need revision".
Low potassium is not the main sign. Resistant hypertension, weakness and nocturnal polyuria are clinical clues. Small adrenal tumours may be seen on CT scans.
A quick diagnostic test of eplerenone (INSPRA) or spironolactone (ALDACTONE) will immediately drop blood pressure in patients with Primary Aldosteronism. INSPRA does not cause gynaecomastia or erectile disfunction..
Primary Aldosteronism is missed in most hypertensives.. 20% of the Canadian population are hypertensive( 6,800,000) 10% of hypertensives have Primary Aldosteronism (680,000). Mainly undiagnosed at present through "cost, ignorance & indifference". Less than 1% of those with Primary Aldosteronism are screened; especially indicated in Atrial fibrillation.
"Guidelines for Primary Hypertension need revision".
Low potassium is not the main sign. Resistant hypertension, weakness and nocturnal polyuria are clinical clues. Small adrenal tumours may be seen on CT scans.
A quick diagnostic test of eplerenone (INSPRA) or spironolactone (ALDACTONE) will immediately drop blood pressure in patients with Primary Aldosteronism. INSPRA does not cause gynaecomastia or erectile disfunction..
24 Oct 2011
ASTRAZENICA FREE PROSTATE CANCER PATIENT NOTEBOOK
Black-cover breastpocket-sized 35 page treatment notebook provided free by AstraZenica.including a PSA tracking graph
22 Oct 2011
UK DAILY MAIL: CIRRHOSIS, DEMENTIA & DRINK
Don't drink on 3 days a week... As the liver crisis deepens, leading doctors warn of the dangers
- More than 16,000 people die from liver disease every year in the UK
- Young regular drinkers and middle-class women particularly at risk
- Royal College of Physicians say current guidelines must be rewritten
By Daniel Martin
Last updated at 11:23 AM on 22nd October 2011
Current official guidance on healthy drinking limits is ‘extremely dangerous’ and must be rewritten – because it implies that drinking every day is fine, the Royal College of Physicians said.
Government advice states men should drink no more than four units a day and women no more than three.
New guidelines: Leading doctors now say drinkers should have at least three alcohol-free days a week
They told MPs the risk of liver disease, alcohol dependence and serious illness increases if people drink every day rather than taking time off.
More...
They also urged Ministers to consider imposing stricter guidelines on pensioners – perhaps as little as seven units a week for older women and 11 for older men.
One unit is the equivalent of one small glass of wine (125ml) or half a pint of lager.
Limits: Government advice states men should drink no more than four units per day and women no more than three
Yet pensioners are currently given the same guidelines as all adults.
In their submission to MPs on the Commons science and technology committee, the doctors said: ‘Government guidelines should recognise that hazardous drinking has two components: frequency of drinking and amount of drinking.
‘To ignore either of these components is scientifically unjustified.
‘A simple addition would remedy this – namely a recommendation that to remain within safe limits people have three alcohol-free days a week.’
They added: ‘The implied sanctioning of a pattern of regular daily drinking is potentially extremely dangerous.
The RCP disputes the claim that drinking every day will not accrue a significant health risk.
‘Frequency is an important risk factor for development of alcohol dependency and alcoholic liver disease.’
More than 16,000 people die from liver disease, usually caused by excessive drinking, every year in the UK.
It is Britain’s fifth biggest killer and the only major cause of death increasing year-on-year. Twice as many people die of it now than in 1991 and rates have soared by 13 per cent since 2005.
The British Liver Trust says liver disease is the biggest cause of premature death for women, and the second only to heart attacks for men.
The first drinking guidelines in 1987 – which were written by the RCP – stated that men should drink no more than 21 units a week and women no more than 14.
On top of this, everyone should take two or three days off a week. Doctors are angry that reforms to the advice in 1995 dropped this reference to alcohol-free days.
‘This in effect appeared to sanction daily or near-daily drinking, one of the key risk factors for alcohol-related harm and dependency,’ they said.
‘If the daily limit of four units was drunk with no drink-free days, this would be the equivalent of 28 units per week; a 30 per cent increase on the RCP’s guidelines.’
Habitual: Young regular drinkers are particularly at risk of developing liver disease later in life
Young regular drinkers were particularly at risk, it said.
A 2009 study showed increases in UK liver deaths ‘are the result of daily or near-daily heavy drinking, not episodic or binge drinking. This regular drinking pattern is discernable at an early age’, the paper said.
Government experts expect the cost of treating people with liver disease will soar by 50 per cent in four years to more than £2billion.
Middle-class women are particularly at risk of daily drinking as they often have a glass or two of wine after work, followed by more at the weekend.
Lower limits should be considered for older people, as even modest levels of alcohol consumption can have a more profound effect on their bodies ‘due to physiological changes associated with ageing’, the paper said.
‘There is concern current guidelines are not appropriate for older people,’ it added.
Sir Ian Gilmore, RCP special adviser on alcohol, said: ‘We recommend a safe limit of 0-21 units a week for men and 0-14 units a week for women provided the total amount is not drunk in one or two bouts and that there are two to three alcohol-free days a week.
‘At these levels, most individuals are unlikely to come to harm.’
In June, a Royal College of Psychiatrists report called for a limit of 11 units a week for men aged over 65 and seven for women of this age.
The RCP quoted these suggested limits but did not explicitly endorse them.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2052070/Alcohol-abuse-Dont-drink-3-days-week-avoid-liver-disease.html#ixzz1bVrk6v8M
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)